![]()
Second, my upload was really limited during these tests and so the WiFi meaningfully could supplement it. First, redundancy seems more important on the uplink than the downlink. Speedify free alternative download#(Although I’d expected 50Mbps on the uplink, needs further testing.) I noticed on the download speed test it was only using the Starlink whereas on upload it saturated both my Starlink and my WISP. These aren’t the best I’ve seen I’ve gotten 150/20 through Speedify, which is about the limit of my Starlink throughput. Here’s a couple of DSL reports speed tests. ![]() There’s some more technical details here. Mostly they’re talking about audio and video streams but the marketing copy mentions gaming, too, so presumably that’s also covered. Streaming mode is a “smart” middle ground it monitors each stream and decides when you need more redundancy. Speed and redundant seem to be two extremes: either maximize performance (but no redundancy) or maximize reliability. The user can choose the bonding mode: speed, streaming, or redundant mode. Speedify, for their part, says you should expect 200-300Mbps.Ī final limitation is that Speedify doesn’t give a lot of control over what it’s doing. Finally some folks complain that Speedify makes their links slower than necessary. Speedify has a special “turn this off for video” feature, but of course video is exactly when you might most want to have Speedify. Also a bunch of video services like Netflix and Amazon now refuse to serve video to VPN datacenters because they’re so often used to work around country restrictions, etc. That works fine actually.Īnother drawback is that Speedify is a VPN service terminated in a data center. (Maybe there’s a way to set up a virtual ethernet device in Windows? Dunno.) I’m working around this by having plugged in a separate WiFi adapter that’s connected to one ISP, with the ethernet to the other. What I’d like to do is use a single ethernet adapter for both my ISPs and have Speedify bond two separate gateways. One drawback is that Speedify seems to require different actual network devices to bond. The UI is pretty slick too, with decent monitoring and configurability. There’s a free no-account-required option for initial testing, limited to 2GB. Installs smoothly, autodetects your links, sets it all up and you’re running on Speedify in seconds. Speedify free alternative install#The Windows install experience is a dream. So far I’ve lost 0.4% of pings to 8.8.8.8 over most of an hour that’s better than I see using either ISP alone. Speedify free alternative full#That’s neat! Also speed tests show I’m getting the full speed of my Starlink, at least sometimes, so it’s not constrained to the lowest common denominator. But the video never stopped and the ssh session stayed alive, presumably using the Wifi backup to my other ISP. The main thing I know about Speedify is I was watching a Youtube video and had an open ssh session and unplugged my ethernet cable that connects me to Starlink. The emphasis on TCP is also a limitation, I’d like a redundancy solution for all IP not just TCP. The Linux kernel has support and there’s various implementations but I can’t tell if any of them are really usable a lot look like research projects. That’s a general technology for doing something similar. I imagine it’s particularly useful to bond crappy hotel wifi with a cellular hotspot (assuming you have two wifi adapters.)īefore I go on about Speedify I want to mention Multipath TCP. I’m using this to paper over Starlink’s unreliability. ![]() It can use extra links to boost speed or reliabilty or both. ![]() It’s a VPN service whose client on your desktop / laptop computer is smart enough to bond two Internet links. Trying to make my Starlink setup reliable enough to use regularly, I think I hit on a good consumer solution: Speedify. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |